• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Marjorie Clayman’s Writing PortfolioMarjorie Clayman’s Writing Portfolio

Professional writing profile of Marjorie Clayman

  • About Me
  • It’s a Little Thing
  • Book Reviews
  • Contact Me

Marketing Talk

Why there will never be a Margie Clayman Facebook Fan Page

by Margie Clayman

I’ve been hearing a lot lately about how people really need to start their own personal fan pages on Facebook to be really effective. I’ve been pretty good about holding my tongue, but darn it all, I just can’t hold it in any longer.

I think fan pages for people are really, really stupid.

Now understand, I am not saying that fan pages on Facebook are stupid. I am not saying that a fan page for a book, an entity, a school, or sleep is stupid. Well, ok, maybe a fan page for sleep is *kind of* stupid. But there will never be a Margie Clayman fan page on Facebook. I don’t care how famous you are or how many followers you have on Twitter. The concept of a fan page for a person kind of makes me get a headache.

Why?

Well, here are some thoughts. You tell me if you agree or not.

Isn’t your profile on Facebook kind of a fan page already?

Let’s talk about a personal page on Facebook as it exists right now (it’s likely to change in the next five minutes or so, of course). OK so, you have your bio information. You have pictures of you, your family, your pets, foods you’ve eaten, clothes you’ve bought, and maybe some random anteaters you’ve seen. You have links to your blog site, probably mentions of where people can find you elsewhere in the online world, and you have friends. Oh so many friends.

What else could you want in a “fan” page? I’m all for changing Facebook’s name to Fanbook, in fact. Think about it for an instant. Aren’t we sort of assuming people we friend on Facebook are fans? Who but fans would put up with some much information about, well, us?

“I need to be myself. I’m creating a fan page.”

I’ve seen this a lot over my tenure in Facebook world, and I have to say I don’t really understand this line of thinking. The rationale is that your personal page is for people you’re really close to and then your fan page is for the drivel. I meant, the fans. Your acquaintances.

I have a few problems with this. First of all, if you create a fan page and close off your personal page, that’s just going to raise questions. What are they saying on their personal very public no privacy Facebook page that they aren’t willing to say out in the open? Second of all, why is that person part of their personal profile but I’m just limited to fandom?

More disconcerting is this thought that if you “lock down” your Facebook profile, you actually have privacy. I worry for people who post extremely personal things on their Facebook pages. That status update about how much you hate your job can be shared. It can be copied and pasted. It can show up in someone’s “ticker.” If your concern is privacy, the best path is to avoid saying anything that could be embarrassing. A fan page will not help you in this endeavor, nor will a million lock-downs on your Facebook account.

Fan pages are by nature 1-way communication channels

If you are a “fan” of someone or something on Facebook, the page is really all about them. You are merely a fan, a bystander, an innocent marauder in a world that is not really yours. What fun is that? How is that web 2.0? Especially if you’re a fan of a *person* who is doing status updates about how important being human is? Doesn’t that make ya scratch your head a little bit? It confuses the heck out of me.

I highly prefer the way things work on my personal page. I post things with the understanding that everything is up for conversation or even debate, so long as it remains somewhat civil. And decent. I want to invite people to converse with me in more than 140 characters. I don’t want to feel like Moses coming down the mountain, ready to deliver my next status update to my adoring masses. Yeck.

Fans versus Friends

Even though the word “friend” is used rather loosely these days, isn’t it more comforting to think that you have 500 friends versus 500 fans? Maybe that’s just me, but having “fans” makes people seem so distant to me. Oh, I’m just a fan. I’m here to adore you. If we’re friends, I feel more open to conversing with you, and assume you feel the same way about me and the rest of the poor plebeians you’re deigning to friend. The doors are open. And even if we aren’t, I can feel like we’re on even ground.

Am I way off base here? Obviously each to his or her own, but I just don’t understand this concept of “fan pages” for individuals.

What am I missing?

Image Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/subcow/280962961/ via Creative Commons

Filed Under: Marketing Talk, Musings

Some Social Media Observations Via Princess Bride

by Margie Clayman

A few days ago, my pal Jason Konopinski and I were talking via “The Twitter” when we suddenly started swapping quotes from the Princess Bride. Jason suggested that I write a blog post encapsulating some of the wisdom we were hitting upon in that conversation, so here is my best shot. I hope you enjoy!

1. “I do not think this word means what you think it means.”

When Vizzini, Fezzik, and Inigo Montoya are stealing away Buttercup, Inigo Montoya keeps noticing that the “Man in black” is following them, to which Vizzini responds repeatedly, “inconceivable.” Vizzini seems like a wise man, but Inigo is just not quite sure that this word is being used 100% properly.

I don’t want to be a jerk, but using this quote online could come in handy.

2. “Yes, you’re very smart. Shut up.”

Little Fred Savage keeps telling his grandfather that he has a pretty good grip on the plotline. At one point he even uses those dreaded words, “See, I told you!” His grandfather says the above quote in response.

Again, I think this could come in handy at times. Sometimes people say things as if these observations are the most profound thoughts in the world. Smacking them down in a firm yet funny way isn’t a crime. Right?

3. “Do you have six fingers on your right hand?” “Do you start all conversations this way?”

Sometimes, especially via Twitter direct messages, I get really weird introductory comments or questions. People sort of act like they’ve known me for a million years, yet in trying to give that sense they actually show how really far off they are. I think I’m going to start responding with, “Do you start all conversations this way?”

4. “Life is pain, princess. Anyone who says otherwise is trying to sell something.”

Now, sometimes people who say otherwise are just trying to cheer you up, but I always crinkle my nose at least a little bit when someone tries to tell me that there are unicorns flying around outside. Now you can get flying unicorns too, for just $150 a unicorn!

5. Buttercup, after kissing the king’s cheek: “Because you have always been so kind to me, and I won’t be seeing you again since I’m killing myself once we reach the honeymoon suite.” The King: “Won’t that be nice. She kissed me, ha, ha, ha!”

Have you ever encountered people who don’t *really* seem to read an entire blog post but have a response they really want to leave for you? Or maybe you say something to someone and they respond with something that seems entirely about them and maybe entirely out of place? Yeah. That.

6. Prince Humperdink: “That may be the first time anyone has DARED to insult me.” Westley: “It won’t be the last.”

I have noticed over my tenure in the online world that the people who feel they are most above reproach are actually the ones who tend to get their butts handed to them the most, whether it’s on Twitter or via the dreaded bloggy call-out. Prince Humperdink certainly thinks he is too good for this world, and Westley most certainly does not let him feel that way for long.

7. “He’s only *mostly* dead.”

This of course is a quote from Mad Max, and I think I’m going to use this retort throughout 2012 whenever someone notes that email, print, television, mobile, the interwebz, or anything else is dead. It’s only *mostly* dead. Which means, of course, that it’s partially living.

8. “REOS’s? They don’t exist.”

Westley tries to comfort Buttercup regarding her fear of rodents of extraordinary size by convincing her that they don’t really exist. Of course, he has already spotted the REOS that is stalking them, so his effort to comfort or help Buttercup actually results in her being blind-sided by the attack. Similarly, I feel sometimes that “experts” in the social media world guffaw at potential dangers in order to comfort their friends or clients when in reality the best move is to prepare them for the fight.

9. “People in masks cannot be trusted.”

Do people wear masks in the online world? Well, an avatar is a mask, is it not? It looks the same no matter what is going on in your real life. Does that mean you should avoid trusting anyone? Of course not. Does it mean you should automatically consider everyone you talk to your 100% best bosom buddy ever? Eh…maybe not. I’d think about it, anyway.

10. “Never go against a Sicilian when death is on the line!”

Despite all of the rumors to the contrary, there really are experts who happen to use social media platforms to communicate. I highly advise you not to try to convince these folks that you know more than them, most especially if you really don’t. It really can make you look bad, and it can also expose the fact that you actually know a lot less than what you had presented. Now that’s a real bummer!

These are the quotes I thought of. What would you add?

Image credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/megadem/1339257745/ via Creative Commons

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

A bit about our agency’s e-newsletter

by Margie Clayman

The end of the year for an agency (and for most businesses, really) is not so much ending a year as getting ready to begin a new year. I wanted to let you know about a new e-newsletter plan that our agency is rolling out for 2012. We’re starting a new format that blends 3 ingredients we like in e-newsletters…curated content, original written content, and a chance to interact with the sender. We’re calling it The Claymanite 411 because we’ll be curating 4 articles, writing one, and including 1 survey question.

I’m showing the editorial calendar for the year here. If this looks interesting, you can opt-in and look for the first installment on January 4th (Wednesday). No catches – just wanted to let you know what we’re up to!

January:

1. Economic update/outlook

2. Global economic trends

February:

1. Learn to love content marketing

2. How to generate engaging content

March:

1. Generating Leads

2. Nurturing Leads

April:  

1. Catching up on mobile

2. Mobile Marketing

May:

1. Aligning marketing and sales

2. Integrating your agency into your team

June:

1. Updates on SEO (like Google Plus making searches private)

2. Do you need SEO?

July:

1. How is your customer service?

2. Ways to give more value to your customers

 August:

1. The Power of Referrals

2. How to increase your referrals

September:

1. It’s not just a marketing plan

2. Planning your follow-up

October:     

1. Social Media Updates

2. Integrating Social Media into your sales and marketing channels

 November:  

1. Looking at ROI over the last year

2. How to know that something worked

December:

The best and worst of 2012

If you do decide to opt in, you will not be surprised by any unwanted selly content or things like that. This is the plan, and the plan this is.

Thanks for listening!

Image Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/digitaltree515/4002439444 via Creative Commons

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

Social Media, Humble Pie, And Daring Not To Win

by Margie Clayman

When I first joined the online world, I noticed a few things right away. I noticed that a lot of people used Twitter handles that were their actual names – this was pretty different from the way people had acted on sites like MySpace and Livejournal, where names were more along the lines of “CuddlyPuppy207.” I noticed that a lot of people had their blog sites at URLs that were “their name.com.” When I first started blogging, my site was at ladybugnotes.blogspot.com. It was a bit of a sore thumb.

People started telling me that I should use my real name on Twitter. People said I would really benefit from having a MargieClayman.com site. It took me a long, long time to decide to move ahead with both of those decisions because, in the end, I am the head chef at Humble Pie Restaurants.

Humility and Social Media -> Oil and Water

Changing my Twitter handle and my blog URL was just the beginning of the challenges I would face in the online world, and these are challenges I still struggle with. I feel yucky every time I tweet out a blog post of mine. I used to just tweet my own posts out once, in fact, and that was all. I don’t like making asks. I don’t like making a big deal out of things I do.

It’s not a matter of confidence. I’m usually very proud of what I’m doing. I just figure if people want to see what I’m up to, they can look. I’d rather shine the light on other people and rejoice in their successes. To me, that’s the power of what social media can do for people, and it’s what I enjoy most.

The problem, of course, is that all of this means that I grow at a tortoise pace, not a hare. People perpetually pass me on statistics we keep track of. My PeerIndex is at a molecular level 11. I just reached 5,000 Twitter followers. I have a little over 150 Blog subscribers. These are numbers I’m perfectly content with, but I’ll be 100% honest – there are people whose numbers are a lot bigger. They get a lot more recognition. And it’s because their priority is on winning the game.

I don’t need to win

One of the interesting things about social media is that we can promote whatever image of ourselves that we want. We can even use pictures of other people for our Twitter avatars and Facebook profile pictures. Who would know? I’ve seen people promote themselves as do-gooders when really they’re just taking advantage of an opportunity. I’ve seen people present themselves as super tough when in fact they are soft-spoken, even shy, offline.

I’ve always felt that it was most important for me to present myself here pretty much as I am. It’s too easy to get bogged down in what you’re trying to present if you’re not being true to yourself. Part of being me is my humility. I could easily sell my soul and promote the heck out of myself. I could probably play the game and play it well.

But that wouldn’t really be winning based on how I define a win. I might win more followers and more subscribers, but I’d lose myself. That’s a pretty high price to pay.

Not a sob story

Of course, this is not to say “Woe is me.” It’s shocking to me that my reception in the online world, for all of this complexity, has been what it has been. That many people want to see what I’m saying? Are you kidding? For me, I’ve already won.

But I’m only human. It stinks when people who don’t write well get more acclaim just because they concentrate on themselves more. It stinks when someone gets lauded for something they are only pretending to do. Even so, I am happy with where I am. I am proud of where I am. Who wouldn’t be proud of the community I’ve gathered in such a short time?

So I will not try to win the social media game. Instead, I will strive to continue to win your support and friendship, and most importantly, I will win the Margie game. I’ll remain true to myself.

What more could a person really want, anyway?

Image Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edsel_/4893846987 via Creative Commons

Filed Under: Marketing Talk, Musings

Margie Clayman’s 100 Favorite Blog Posts of 2011

by Margie Clayman

I can’t really say that doing something one year is the stuff traditions are made of, but once you do something for two years, well, there’s a chance it might catch on.

With that in mind, I present you, for the second year in a row, with my favorite blog posts of the year. This year, presented in no particular order or categorization (uncharacteristically for me!). Enjoy, and Happy Holidays!


 

I hope you enjoy this list. I know I didn’t include every post that touched me this year. But these are a good solid handful.

Image Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/funadium/553343932/ via Creative Commons

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

Why I Remain Unaffiliated

by Margie Clayman

Pretty early on in my online career, like, a year ago, I was fortunate to meet a lot of great people, mostly because of all of the chats I participated in. I found a way to tie these people together on a daily basis so that they evolved into my online community, and a great community it was! And is, I should note. However, something interesting happened with this particular group of people. They started sort of clotting together into different groups. In the online world we call them tribes a lot of times. In the world of Twitter they’re grouped together under the same hashtag.

As these individual groups started growing, I noticed that people who used those hashtags all of the time stopped talking to me as regularly as they once had. I noticed that I seldom saw them tweet anything without that hashtag after it. For awhile, I played along, but then I realized that once you start participating in a tightly knit group like that, you stop looking at your home feed. Your primary focus is just on that hashtag. Who is entering it, who is contributing to it – these things become your primary focus. If people don’t use that hashtag, you simply don’t see them anymore.

I didn’t like that idea.

For a little while after I made that realization I would occasionally pop in and use the hashtag to converse with people. But then something even more interesting happened. The community that had been building so closely under that hashtag started to become really overpowered with drama, direct messages, rumor mills, and general unpleasantness. I found myself not wanting to be affiliated with the hashtag because it was starting to feel like a symbol of general chaos and ickiness, as sad as that was. So, I basically stopped using the hashtag altogether and worked to maintain my individual friendships with the people that had gotten involved with the group.

In a different dimension

A year later, I have absolutely no regrets. This is not to say that these online tribes are bad. In fact, a lot of these communities build around really great ideas and really great messages. But here’s what I want you to consider.

In a different dimension, if I had started using just that hashtag at the exclusion of most other things and then gotten disenchanted with that hashtag, as I likely still would have, what would I have done? It’s the old case of putting all of your eggs into one basket. Yes, when you are in a tightly-knit community there are tons of advantages. Your posts may get shared more often. You can band around people who are having a hard time. You know there is a force out there supporting you. But if you put everything you have into just that community and that community later falls apart, what do you have left?

People in the online world do not stick around waiting for you to come back and say, “Hey, let’s be best pals.” A day is practically an eternity in a lot of ways. Abandoning the world at large in favor of a single group is painting yourself into a corner.

Hidden Agendas

There is another caution I’d throw out there when it comes to online groups or “tribes,” especially as they exist on Twitter. I’ve seen it happen a lot. As a group starts to get big and get noticed, suddenly it’s not just a group of friends. Suddenly there is a sense that maybe this is something that could give people fame and notoriety. Maybe this is something that could get you on a social media panel at a big show. Maybe this is something that could help your brand and/or your business. When these thoughts start going through peoples’ heads, the idea of community moves on back to the rear of the vehicle. A power struggle ensues and the community gets confused about what is going on. What is this power grab all about? A lot of people can get hurt, and again, if the community is all you banked on, you can end up out in the Twittery cold.

Sometimes too, a person will be promoted within the group or excluded from the group because of one person’s feelings. Is that what adults who are professionals in the great big world need to be worrying about? To me, participating in these close-knit groups is an invitation for trouble just because of the way people are and the way people work within the online world.

Just like high school

I know that some people will take issue with this, but to me, the concept of “tribe” in the online world is really quite similar to the high school clique. Each community or tribe gets its ringleaders, its traditions, its little idiosyncrasies that make it different. If you don’t want to go along with the dance, you will be subtly blocked out. If you opt not to participate in these groups, you will not get the same kind of support that people in those groups get. Like everything in life, it’s a question of what you want to have and what you’re willing to trade.

I have always been happy as the floating friend. I can jump into and out of a lot of groups and yet not remain tied to them. I can offer exchanges with all sorts of people because I keep my view of the online world big and unlimited. Is it the right way to go? No, I can’t say that. Is it the better way to go? Can’t really say that either. Would I advise you to take this road?

Yes, I would.

What do you think?

Image credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/aigle_dore/4044211790 via Creative Commons

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 97
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

marjorie.clayman@gmail.com

   

Margie Clayman © 2025