• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Marjorie Clayman’s Writing PortfolioMarjorie Clayman’s Writing Portfolio

Professional writing profile of Marjorie Clayman

  • About Me
  • It’s a Little Thing
  • Book Reviews
  • Contact Me

Marketing Talk

Editorial Calendars aren’t just for print anymore

by Margie Clayman

It’s always nice when you find out that something you’ve been thinking about and even talking about has crossed the mind of an expert. For example, if you put together an experimental recipe only to find out that a very similar recipe just helped someone win Iron Chef, that would be a great feeling.

My moment of joy is equally intense though slightly less delicious. For several months, I have been thinking about the intersection between Social Media and editorial calendars. One of the most common flags that arise when you mention Social Media is the fear that there is just not enough content or not enough time to create that content. Having begun my professional career as a B2B media buyer, the idea of the editorial calendar crossed my mind. Yes, even for Twitter.


How would this work?

Granted, a lot of the action you see on Twitter and Facebook is interaction. It’s responding, retweeting, and all that stuff. If you follow Chris Brogan’s rules about blogging, you should have about 1 of your own posts for every 10-12 replies or retweets. But still, that can mean 2-3 tweets/day. And if there isn’t blistering hot news about you, your brand, or your company, what can you say? That’s where the idea of the editorial calendar comes in. Like a publisher’s editorial calendar, it doesn’t have to be 100% pinned down, but you can have some ideas. “In May we’re going to that trade show, so let’s tweet to drive traffic and interest.” Get the topic ready and the tweets and updates and blog posts will come. If you plan ahead, your mind starts working on these ideas. There is your content.

So what other brilliant person had thought of this already?

I was perusing YouTube for some of Denise Wakeman’s blog videos, and I found this interview with Michael Stelzner.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8kec6mSX1s&hl=en_US&fs=1&]

You guessed it, Denise, Blog Squad queen, mentions putting together an editorial calendar for blogging.

The really powerful thing about putting together an editorial calendar for your Social Media campaign is that this can assist you in building a truly integrated campaign. What print ads or online ads are you going to be using in June? Can some of that messaging be built upon for a blog post or a Facebook update? You probably have more content than you realize. It just needs to be thought of in different ways.

If you’ve tried something like this before, let me know how it worked for you! I have tried it myself and found that it immediately made posting a far less cumbersome and stressful process. Hey, that’s something I always am shooting for!

Image by Jan Willem Geertsma. http://www.sxc.hu/profile/jan-willem

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

What’s so funny about proofing, editing, and proofing again?

by Margie Clayman

 I was watching a really impressive webinar today. Very good points that I haven’t heard anyone make, at least in my sphere of knowledge and experience. Indeed, I was so impressed with this person that I decided to click to their website to learn some more. From there, I was taken to the site for one of this person’s books, which I was considering buying on the spot.

What stunned me, and the reason that I am blogging right now instead of buying a book on Amazon, is that in glancing at the first few lines of copy on the site, I saw two major flubs.

Now, we all make mistakes. I mean, everyone except me. (ha ha) But it really seems like a lot of people are either not cognizant of this fact or they just don’t care. This is a sad thing, because to me, a poorly constructed sentence, a misspelled word, or something else along those lines not only bespeaks the potential for not having a grasp of English (pet peeve), but it also tells me that this person doesn’t care enough to give things a once-over.

I kind of get laughed at sometimes at my place of employ because I insist on proofreading everything. Thoroughly. My rule: if a page is touched, even if it’s just a minor correction, you proof the whole page. Why? Making a single change can push a word down to the next line, which in turn can push the copy into the footer area of a brochure or website. If you don’t proofread and really look carefully, you can end up with a product that looks sloppy. It will look like you didn’t want to take the time to do things right.

I’m not going to lie to you. Proofreading can be boring. Torturous even. If you are proofreading an e-commerce site or a sales brochure with lots and lots of useful tables and charts, you might feel like you need regular injections of pixie sticks right into your ole veins. But these are steps that have to be taken. I can’t tell you how many times proofreading has resulted in us asking questions that really made our clients analyze what they were presenting. “Did you mean to say pack here, or should it say bulk pack?” “Should this be 20 inches or 20 feet?” Little strokes of the keyboard, but boy what a difference.

I did not end up buying this presenter’s book. I was completely turned off by the website I visited. Would there be typos in the book as well? I can’t be sure. Now, I am more of a stickler than a lot of people, it’s true, but let me ask you one question. Would you take advice from a psychologist that kept crying? Would you go to a doctor who couldn’t say “surgery” correctly? Similarly, I find it hard to take advice about marketing and my profession from someone who has major typos on the homepage of a representative website. It just doesn’t work for me. Does it work for you?

Image by ilker. http://www.sxc.hu/profile/ilco

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

Why not discuss a revolution in ROI?

by Margie Clayman

 A couple of days ago, Jay Baer, who is one of my favorite social media gurus, wrote a blog called “Are you Slow Enough to Succeed in Social Media?” The article said something that I’ve been thinking about for a long time. Namely, Social Media is the hot new toy that everyone wants a piece of, it’s revolutionary, and EVERYBODY has to have it…but we’re not really 100% sure how it’s all going to shake down just yet. 


What you can learn from Spring


As I’m writing, it’s about 37 degrees outside and it’s raining. Not exactly what normally comes to mind when you think May, but it’s definitely the time when gardeners are really ready to get outside and get dirt under their fingernails. The thing that you learn from gardening is that you have to be patient beyond the boundaries of what life normally requires. You plant seeds and it might be a whole year till you see anything. You could have a plant for 20 years and it might not bloom till the 21st year. Despite the fact that you might not have asparagus or green beans or a beautiful hedge of roses on your first try, you keep watering and fertilizing and making sure the plant is getting enough light. You do this because you know that eventually it’s bound to pay off.


As per Baer’s blog, this is how companies really should be looking at Social Media. But it’s not how a lot of companies are looking at social media.


You say you want a revolution…


So everyone is talking about how we’re in this marketing and media revolution, but it strikes me that even though everyone agrees on this, we are still asking about ROI in the same way that we did for print or banner ads. It seems like there isn’t a whole lot of conversation regarding the fact that a revolutionary new movement in media just might require us to think about ROI very differently.


If a company has everything together, it can be fairly easy to calculate the ROI for a print or online ad. Bring the people that see your ad to a specific page with a call to action, nurture that lead, convert to customer. Well, it looks a lot easier on screen, but really, that process is feasible.


In Social Media, it simply does not work that way. First of all, what you are investing, most of the time, is not money. It’s time. It’s content. Now you could say that time is money and I suppose that would be fair, but you’re probably not paying for a “full page, 4-color profile” on Facebook or Twitter, right? So right away, the phrase “return on investment” needs to be examined more carefully. Return on what investment?


The other thing though, getting back to Baer’s blog, is that Social Media is not a 1 + 1 = 2 kind of formula. It’s about building relationships, becoming a trusted source, building the case for your brand through reliability and credibility — it’s taking the time to be human via as many digital sites as possible. 


I’ve got news for you — “leads” from Facebook and Twitter and LinkedIn are not going to be people who click to a landing page and fill out a sample request form. Leads are people you’ve been talking to for six months who suddenly say, “What was that you were saying about such and such? Cuz I need help with that now.”


If you tell a boss that the projected ROI for your Social Media campaign is one strong lead over a six-month period, btw, you’ll probably not get a real big thumbs-up reaction.


I don’t know what the new ROI should be, but I think we need to catch it up to what we’re talking about elsewhere. If you’re completely changing how you relate to customers, how you relay your messaging and how you get out your content, your ROI has to change too. We’re trying to use an abacus to do rocket science right now, I think. And it’s not gonna work.

Image by Robert Proksa. http://www.sxc.hu/profile/fangol

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

Linking the Tactics, Using the Buffalo

by Margie Clayman

About 3 years ago, all of the talk was about “integrated marketing.” Maintain a common aesthetic across all of your marketing channels to increase the strength of your brand.

Last year, all of the talk was about Social Media. It was a new frontier (relatively), and if there was one thing we all wanted to see last year, it was something new.

This year, “the talk” is all over the place. Is mobile marketing the new darling? Is it going to defeat Social Media? Is Google going to take over the world or is Facebook going to beat it to the punch? Is print dead or just on vacation?

Maybe it’s the pacifist in me, but I don’t think marketing is going to be about just one thing ever again. I think the companies that are really going to soar are going to be the ones who do everything and do everything well.

Chris Brogan wrote a post today where he used the phrase “Buffalo Content Maker.” The idea is that generating content for one purpose is not the most efficient way to go about things. If you have a public speaker come in to talk to your company, per Brogan’s example, why not videotape it, post it to YouTube, link back to your website, and become a resource? In Brogan’s own case, blog posts are becoming books, presentations, tweets, and more.

These are all great ideas, but they are predicated upon the fact that your key emphasis is the online world, particularly the Social Media world. I would like to see someone using a buffalo that is made of new media and yes, the horror, traditional media.

How can you do this?

Let’s jump off from a similar place to where Brogan started. Let’s say one of your customers has invited you to do a product demo at their facility. You pool your resources and get your talk ready. With you is someone to videotape the session.

When you get back, you do a little editing and post the video to YouTube. Ask your customer if you can include any questions and things they might have brought up that were good points.

Put together a little news release that you send out to the industry and post to your website. Great product demo now available. Link to the YouTube video. It’s okay not to link to your site. If they like what they see, they’ll link to your site from YouTube — a boost for SEO.

Let’s say you have a trade show coming up. Burn the video to CD, design some nice face art, and you have a give-away for the show that people won’t just throw on the floor (CDs seem more precious than sheets of paper or fliers, I’ve noticed). If you’re really feeling wild, create a direct mail piece in which the CD of the video can be inserted. Invite people to view the CD and bring their questions to your booth.

This is just one example, and not a full example, of how Social Media and the ever-changing online world can actually enrich rather than over-power tactics in which companies were engaged but a few years ago. Social Media doesn’t have to defeat traditional media and mobile marketing doesn’t have to defeat Social Media. Everything can be linked together to create a single, giant, buffalo-like chain. Use it up. The possibilities are endless.

Image by Antonio Jiménez Alonso. http://www.sxc.hu/profile/Capgros

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

I’m a little iffy on this new Facebook

by Margie Clayman

A long time ago…maybe, say, 3-4 weeks ago, back in the good ole days, a company could create a “fan page” on Facebook and advertise that page based on people’s interests.

After the 2010 F8 Conference, “fans” became “likers.” It didn’t exactly have the same ring to it, but essentially, a company’s relationship with Facebook remained the same. Be engaging, get people to like you, build brand.

A few days after all of those changes, Facebook launched the other side of the new “Open Graph” model. Now, a person’s interests, schools, and places of employment are links to pages. TechCrunch has a pretty good summary of these changes.

Although my friends represent only a small portion of the people on Facebook, and I am fully aware of that, I have yet to hear a person, friend or not, say that they are really happy about these changes on a personal level. The main beef is that Facebook isn’t giving you a choice. You either link to pages or your interests are deleted. Seems a little dictatorial.

The problem, on the business side of things, seems to be a many-armed beast, if you ask me. These new pages are inspiring a lot of people to delete their interests all together. Many of my friends noted that the people they are connected to probably are aware of what they are interested in anyway. I myself haven’t really looked at my own interests in a couple of years. If tons of people start deleting their interests rather than link to these new pages, the capability of running targeted ad campaigns to promote company pages is going to be highly hindered.

Another issue which I haven’t seen a whole lot of talk about: Facebook just became the newest SEO battle. Companies should now position themselves to target keywords that might be interests but might not be 100% pertinent to their business. To me, this will thin out the value of “likers” on a company page. If they are linking to you because they like bananas and you are an ice cream manufacturer, that’s kind of okay but kind of not. I also wonder if companies who may or may not have created their page with a strategy in mind are keeping up on their page demographics. It’s an easy enough thing to monitor, but now it will require more time to successfully target Facebookers, and time is a commodity not a lot of people have in droves.

I know that a lot of Social Media gurus are really excited by these changes, but I have yet to be impressed. The possible negative ramifications for company pages are being predominantly ignored, I think. I am also not impressed that Facebook is building their new “community pages” based on imported data from Wikipedia. Why not comb peoples’ info and get experts on the topic to participate? It might not be any more credible than Wikipedia, but it would be for Facebookers by Facebookers.

I’m sitting on the sidelines and I’m not getting up to leave just yet, but I’m not getting up to applaud just yet either. Convince me I’m wrong!

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

#14: You *can* DIY, but should you?

by Margie Clayman

 There’s not a whole lot I lament missing when it comes to The Middle Ages. That whole “the more you enjoy yourself the more you will burn in hell” thing must have been, well, not very enjoyable. Unless you were lucky enough to be born into royalty as a man, life pretty much stunk for you. But there is one thing that I do wish we had preserved from The Middle Ages — an appreciation for craftsmanship.

Not to paint with a broad brush, but it seems like many professions are being affected by the mantra of “Heck, I could do that!” It shows up in insidious ways. For example, a friend of mine is a teacher in a struggling school district. The district is struggling so much, in fact, that the teachers were asked if they would be willing to teach one day a week without getting paid. Now I happened to know my friend back in college when she was pursuing her degree in education. In addition to her classwork, she had to wake up at ungodly hours to go to classrooms and basically train on the job. She did a ton of student teaching, which is not a walk in the park. She studies, she cares. Just like 90% of the teachers out there. They were not willing to teach for free. Teaching is their job.

The parents in the district attacked the teachers for this and said they didn’t care about the students. It does not register with them that teaching is a paid profession and one that requires craftsmanship in order to be truly good.

Our society is filled with examples that make us think we can just go ahead and do something. Television commercials for Lowes and Home Depot  give you the confidence you need to paint your house or build a brick wall. Google offers a suite of services that can assist anyone in doing really anything he or she wants online. There are kits for teaching yourself a foreign language. There are even kits that claim that they make you paint like a Monet or a Cezanne.

There’s a key differentiation missing in all of these examples. Yes, you CAN just stand in front of a group of people and repeat what you know and call that teaching. Yes, you can go to some template house and build a functional website. Yes, you can buy a kit and feel like you’re the next Picasso.

But should you?

There are people out there who spend a lot of time, money, blood, sweat, and tears to learn a craft, whether it’s masonry, teaching, or yes, even things related to marketing. I might know the mechanics of teaching and I might even know some best practices, but I don’t know enough to know what I don’t know. I think that’s probably true of a lot of people. I know about Google Analytics but I’m not Avinash Kausik. I love doing Yoga but I’m not Suzanne Deason.

Is it easier to become expert at some things now? Probably. Through a lot of experience in painting walls,  you learn what works and what doesn’t, and pretty soon you can start a blog that offers pointers. By doing a lot of studying, you yourself can become a good teacher or a marketing expert or whatever you want to be. But I am worried about this wave of thought that makes people think that because they can do something, not only should they do it, but it will be just as good as what a craftsman would do.

As for me, I’m off to paint the Sistine Chapel.

Image by John Nyberg. http://www.sxc.hu/profile/johnnyberg

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 93
  • Page 94
  • Page 95
  • Page 96
  • Page 97
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

marjorie.clayman@gmail.com

   

Margie Clayman © 2025