You Can’t Judge A Person By The Numbers
As I was walking the streets of Evanston, Illinois on Friday night, a group of kids passed me by. As we were passing each other a voice shouted out, “God d–n you’re short!” Now, in the overall scheme of the universe, this inarticulate and really idiotic proclamation is less than a crumb in significance, but the fact is that people make these kinds of statements to other people all of the time. “Why are you so short?” “Why are you so tall?” “Why are you so fat?” “Why are you so darned thin?” All of these questions and mockeries revolve around our society’s obsession with numbers. There is a range of “normal” (although I’m not sure what that range is, per se) that you can fall into for height, weight, even body mass index. If your number is too big or too small, you will very likely encounter people who will point this out to you.
There’s no question, certainly, that things are moving fast these days. People want shortcuts for everything, including the analysis of other people. By looking at those numbers – height, weight, number of freckles, number of pimples – people can quickly sort you into interesting or … something else. The problem, of course, is that people are much more than just those numbers. I am more than a person who happens to be smaller than the average bear. You are more than whatever external characteristics you present in your everyday life. By judging people based on numbers, we miss a universe of interesting things about people.
In the online world, the same logic applies
Daria Giron (aka @mominmanagement) asked me to write a post this month about what the numbers mean in Social Media. After all, we’ve got a lot of numbers to think about, don’t we? I mean, just as a blogger, you worry (probably) about your traffic number, your bounce rate number, the number of comments you get, the number of retweets you get, and your number of subscribers. On Facebook we worry about the number of “likes” we get on a company page. In Twitter-world, it’s about the number of followers you have. And already, in Google Plus, people are worrying about how many people have circled them. There are Klout numbers, Peer Index numbers, Alexa rating numbers. We’re literally surrounded with numbers.
Just like in the offline world, it’s easy to succumb to the temptation of making snap judgments about people just based on their numbers. People are even starting to make hires based on Klout scores. In my experience, though, numbers are as distracting in the online world as they are in the real world. They distract you from the actual quality of a person because you’re so busy evaluating various issues of quantity. I have noticed, for example, that a lot of Twitter accounts that have over 10,000 followers are some of the least engaging I encounter. Accounts that maybe have 200 followers are all over the place, reaching out to people and trying to help out. People who don’t even know what Klout is may do a job 1,000 times better than someone who has a Klout score of 75. But the numbers make it easy. They summarize a person, if you will. They help you sort people faster. But what are you risking with that short cut?
Don’t judge yourself by the numbers, either
Of course, the onus of looking past the numbers doesn’t just rest on other people. In life and in the online world, you need to remember that numbers are just a part of the story. You have to make sure that while the numbers may be woven into the story you tell, they don’t end up taking over your entire story and directing it in ways you may not want to go.
If I wanted to, I could surrender into the utter exhaustion that represents being a little person in this world. But I make sure that I don’t let that part of my story become the sum total of my being. If you’re a little heavier than you want to be, it may be easy to feel like you’re just alienated from the rest of the world. But there’s more to you than that number. If you’re taller than the average person, skinnier than the average person, it can be easy to fixate on that and let that become your nametag, if you will. “Hi, I’m me and I am abnormal.” Don’t let YOURSELF label you that way.
Similarly, the destructive temptation in the online world is to say things like, “Oh gosh, I only have 150 Twitter followers. I just am not getting anywhere.” Or maybe you think, “Oh man, I never get any comments on my blog. I must be a bad writer.” These numbers are really not instructive though in the greatest sense of the word. You need to look for the full story. Sure, maybe you have 150 followers, and maybe there are people who have a lot more than that. Have you ever looked at those accounts that have tons and tons of followers? You’ll be shocked at how many eggs you see in the avatar pictures. How many spam bots you see who are just gravitating toward that big presence. Your 150 starts to look pretty good. Maybe you’re not getting a lot of comments but a lot of people are linking to your posts. That’s still great!
To me, numbers are weighted far too much in our lives – online and offline. The stuff that really matters, like love, companionship, the soul…those can’t be weighed or measured, and to me, that’s instructive of how we should look to interact with people and how we should judge our own selves. It’s easy to assign a number to someone, and it’s quick. But you lose an awful lot in the translation.
What do you think?
Image by Gabriella Fabbri. http://www.sxc.hu/profile/duchesssa
34 comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Margie, I love this post. Had no idea people were using Klout numbers to determine new hires. Wow. If I were simply to use numbers as a measuring stick, I’d have reason to be grim. What I’ve learned is that the quality of the interaction is what matters; not necessarily the number of interactions.
In Christianity we’re taught that Heaven throws an all out party over ONE person who converts. That’s a lot celebration over one person! Again the emphasis is not on volume but rather in the positive interaction.
Numbers are used to justify time and expense and if it doesn’t add up, then it’s viewed as a waste of time and resources. Never mind the positive experiences that were had. I know we need numbers and metrics but maybe they should count far less in regard to a person’s worth.
Thanks for sharing Margie.
That’s a great analogy, Lisa. I like that. In many religions, it doesn’t matter how many good deeds you do or how many people you help. It just matters that you try to do good things and that you do try to help. The idea of a tally board just doesn’t make sense.
And let’s be honest, weighing a heart or soul to see how pure gold it is doesn’t happen either.
So glad you liked the post and thank you for your wonderful comment!
I put a lot of thought into this “scoring and numbers” bit and the myth of being able to measure everything to a quantity this weekend following the downgrading of the US to a AA+ from AAA by Standard & Poor’s on Friday. I listened to Barney Frank’s rebuke of them and he has a point. In the end, though it will not matter. We are the same country, but investors are lazy and want to be told a score. So the score will matter.
Same with FICO. Watch this short commercial http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ea0bwbtWvWQ (ignore the fact that they are really selling the Experian Plus Score that nobody uses, but the message is there) Thing is, nobody cares who Stan is. They see a 580 no matter how hard he works or what his plight is… great sales piece; lots of folks will identify with it; they will sell a lot of crap but in the end, Stan is still 580.
Look at what is happening in “education reform.” Schools are striving to get good numbers now, not teach. The number is the thing. The grade is the thing. (follow @DianeRavitch and #edreform if you are not already.) I heard a report on NPR this weekend about how the local schools here in Dayton surrounding are excited that there are fewer schools on the “failing” list. Did they get better at educating? No, they just got better at hitting a testing number. I know this because the local McDonalds can still only hire semi-literate kids who barely finished high school. They were doing that 20 years ago when I first moved to Dayton.
So at the end, Klout matters. Facebook likes matter. BMI matters (try getting health insurance with lower or higher than range…) the number of comments you get on a blog post matters. Page views matter. Platform reach matters (try getting a book published. The first question they ask is “what’s your platform?”) GotSoccer score matters for teams even though they admit to selling a higher score.
These numbers shouldn’t matter, but do. So instead of railing against them, we find ways of using them to our advantage. Like CreditReport.com uses a low score to sell their crap. Like GotSoccer uses the fear of a low score to sell advertising. My corporation is developing a product that takes advantage of FICO in a fun, human way. Chris Farley used his weight for comedy. http://listverse.com/2008/06/23/top-10-funny-fat-guys-in-entertainment/ top 10 list here…
The smart people (and dogs) look beyond the numbers. But the curse of the smart people is always being outnumbered by the dumb, lazy people… at least 3:1 but I’m busy working on a more accurate score 🙂
Great points altogether, Rufus.
I was just talking about the problems with standardized testing last week over a lunch meeting. Teachers are evaluated based on how their students perform on standardized tests. That means that a teacher who has 37 students from troubled homes in his or her class is going to be tested on the same scale as a teacher who has 15 supremely gifted students in his or her class.
Beyond that, the fact that students are evaluated based on standardized testing is ludicrous. When I was in high school, I took a mock SAT for practice. In the math section, I skipped a question but forgot to leave that line of bubbles blank, so all of my answers were 1 question off, resulting in a score that showed I was in the 3rd percentile in my class. Had my guidance counselor not noticed that, I may have been identified as a student who was mentally challenged mathematically (that might have been accurate, but that’s beside the point).
Numbers are good benchmarkers, but there is almost always more to the story.
Thank you for your great comment, as always!
“Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts.” ~ Albert Einstein
That is all. Cheers! Kaarina
Well said! 🙂
Unfortunately I think Rufus is right. I WANT the world to work the way you wrote about it Margie. I WANT people to look beyond the numbers, but they do matter. Both in real life and social media. But, don’t forget to look at your numbers in depth. How many engaged readers do you have? How many quality comments are you getting? Those should matter more than gross numbers – even though just the scale of comments or followers does matter too.
Absolutely, Daria. We can’t just toss numbers out. They do influence us and they are important. But they are not the end of the story, they are only the beginning.
Thanks for your comment!
Numbers used to be only good for mathematicians and knowing your place in lines. Now they rule our “worth”. We are teaching the upcoming generation that in order to be successful your ‘number’ must be at least fill-in-the-blank. Otherwise, massive fail. In a perfect world we’d be back to seeing someone as a person with many layers and not an algorithm to be slotted into neat stacks. We’ve taken the humanness out so much we may soon turn into robots instead of people.
What a sad commentary on how we ‘see’ others.
Well said, Grace. One of my favorite repeated lines in the movie Avatar was, “I see you.” What a significant statement that is. Do we really see people anymore? Once we get beyond all of the numbers, is there still enough room for us to give a person a chance? Sometimes it seems doubtful, doesn’t it?
Thanks for the comment!
I think its a good post, Margie.
Numbers do rule our lives, along with a lot of other things, like degrees, etc. we all forget that there are (for the most part) normal human beings behind that. We are driven by society to measure up, once we figure out how the measuring is done. We label ourselves and then we become prisoners to that label.
But you are right. The raw numbers don’t mean a thing if we are not engaging and helping our fellow human beings.
I’m new to all this, and yes I felt bad, when I only had a few followers on Twitter. Now, I don’t see how I’d manage more. I tap into the stream a few times a day. What can you do with 10,000 followers. How would you ever find the good stuff in the stream.
My blog is tiny, but each comment is precious. Some days I don’t get any, but that’s not the goal; I’m pretty sure someone is reading. The goal is to meet people where they are and try o help them. Perhaps the difference is that I am not monetized, I am not selling anything, and I think I’m really ok with never being considered an A-lister.
We give our minds, morals, core values and power away to the numbers.
Again, good post.
You’re exactly right Martina. I too wonder how I’d be able to deal with 74 comments on a post or 10,000 followers. How would I get anything done? It’s all about a question of quantity versus quality in the online world, but sadly, the quantity seems to most often fall into the spotlight. How do we change that? I have no idea.
It’s amazing to see how numbers play such an important role in life even online and I really don’t blame those that are obsessed over it. After all, numbers are one of the few things that are tangible, boast-able and to a certain extend, empowers – but it never lasts. Great post as always! 🙂
Good point! In the online world especially, everything seems sort of intangible and beyond our grasp. Numbers are things that aren’t up for debate. They aren’t questioned. If you have 50 followers, you have 50 followers, and that’s the end of the story. But life would be pretty dull with just tangible stuff, don’t you think? 🙂
Margie – This post resonated well with me. I deal with numbers daily in my Air Force Public Affairs job. No matter how valid, insightful and meaningful they are, they do not tell the entire story. Data needs to be evaluated against leadership perspective, organizational goals, resources available to tackle issues and good ol’ instinct, which I believe is actually experience speaking from your soul you may not even recall. I plan to share this post with my team of fellow communication planners.
I love that, Joel. Experience speaking from your soul. That is a grand thought.
Thank you so much for your comment. I am delighted you liked the post!
I paid a lot of attention to numbers in my recent role because my bonus was dependent upon how many followers I got for the brand on Twitter, how many likes we got on Facebook and how many members we got to sign-up for our LinkedIn group. Do numbers play a role in calculating the ROI in social? That is the only place I see this making sense. If we know that 1:100 likes will result in a sale, then it does seem to matter that we get 500, 700, or 1000 – right?
As for me personally, I did get excited when my Twitter following crossed the 1000 mark but I get even more excited every single day when I have meaningful mini conversations with people in the network. Even more so when I receive a tweet saying that they loved my post or favorited something I shared. Have heard as well the impact of the Klout score on hire-ability (is that a word?) and since I am unexpectedly unemployed at the moment, I have to pay attention to it just because. If the people hiring me thinks its important, then I need to too. At least until I land a killer job.
Really enjoyed this post Margie! Was so nodding my head the entire time I was reading (I guess I look too young for my age and am too skinny to be able to eat crap all day – LOL!)
haha 🙂 You’re funny, m’dear!
Yes, you raise a good point. There’s the ideal and then there’s the way the rest of the world is going. It would be great if people looked beyond Klout when making hiring decisions, but if that’s the way the wind is blowing, we have to pay heed to that. I hope, though, that even in situations where Klout does play into the decision other characteristics of the person are reviewed as well.
And I’m right there with you regarding benchmarks. I got very excited when I got 100 followers or 100 subscribers, but I also know who of those subscribers and followers are genuine excellent additions to my life’s fabric. That’s a good balance to have, I think. At least it works for me!
Number, statistics, measurement tools all have their place. Some people use them as the holy grail though. Measuring people by numbers starts at birth – APGAR. If you don’t score high enough then you’re ‘at risk’ and ‘in need of intervention’. It continues throughout life. And sometimes even at death. But rarely do you ever see numbers in an obituary or hear them in a eulogy. In death, we are measured by the lives we’ve touched, the friends we’ve made, the love/knowledge/hope/inspiration we’ve shared.
Same with businesses – some of the most phenomenal businesses have no Klout, Likes or Followers. Does that make them less valuable?
People often ask me how may friends I have on Facebook. And when I tell them ‘about 50’ they’re shocked. Certainly, ‘someone like me’ should have more friends. Social media metrics are a lot like beanie babies, cabbage patch kids or pokemon cards. What’s hot is always changing. And the reality is that if the numbers don’t deliver to the bottom line they’re worthless!
Thank you, as always, Margie, for your terrific insight.
Sara
That’s a wonderful point, Sara. I really like that. Your obit will not say, “Well, so and so made x number of dollars, was 5’6, weighed 120 pounds.” No, what you see in rememberances are things that can’t be measured, like notes about the person who loved to cook or how the person sang up a storm around the holidays. That’s the intangible stuff that (I believe) makes us all who we are.
Thanks for your comment!
Hi Margie! You bring up an excellent point, and hit on something I’ve been thinking about a lot lately. It’s easy to get discouraged when you see certain individuals who have thousands of twitter followers, compared to my measly one-hundred and something. Yes, I think numbers matter, but it’s pretty obvious that they are not everything. It’s the same way you can see a friend who has 700+ facebook friends. Really? You think this person is having genuine relationships with all of these people? Highly doubtful. I’d rather focus on a smaller number of people and have my message reach them than get caught up in the number game.
Very true, Ali. I’m glad that part of the message resonated with you.
When I was stuck at around 64 followers on Twitter for the first several months I was on the platform, I got dreadfully discouraged. No one was talking to me, I couldn’t seem to get any traction, and yet everyone I encountered was talking to someone else. I couldn’t figure it out.
Then I realized that the online world is a lot about the world of percentages. A lot of times, people are talking to each other but really don’t know or like each other. The people I talk to tend to be people I really like and talk to on a very regular basis. Will I get up to sky-high numbers that way? Probably not. But boy is it much more enjoyable in comparison to just going after the numbers!
Wow, you are short? You write much larger because it’s always over my head……….of course, I’m just a fat, pasty, white guy, so what do I know, huh?
We are what we are, fortunately I have reached a point I am totally comfortable within my skin. At this point, this is as good as it’s going to get and I can’t change it. I really try not to be judgmental, especially for things out of your control (short, tall, red hair, old, young, etc).
Online, the ONLY reason I know my Klout score is because it pops up in HootSuite when I click on my name. I am much more interested in the personal engagement; I frequent several posts that only have a few comments.
I am definitely more interested in quality engagements rather than quantity numbers. Now if someone would pay me $1 for every twitter follower I might actually seek some out……:).
I think if you take care of the ‘real’ relationships first, everything else will fall into place.
That’s my story today and I’m sticking with it.
PS – I don’t mean to keep tagging you in my posts, but I thought your twitter recap was appropriate for the point I was trying to make.
You’re so sweet, Bill.
Being comfortable in one’s own skin, whether real or virtual, is really 90% of the struggle. Once you have that, it’s really hard for anyone to take you down. When we let others bring us down, what we really are doing is hearing our own voice verbalized by someone else. I believe that firmly.
And of course I don’t mind you tagging me. I consider it an honor!
Thanks, Bill!
Oh Margie when I saw the title an arrow went through my heart. Numbers are bad? What is a math geek to do?
Then I read the post, and LOVED it. I’m always telling people numbers, and in the broader sense financial analysis, are tools to be thoughtfully used. Would you ask your hammer, “Hey hammer, is it time to reroof the house?” I hope not.
BTW – despite being 5’4″ I have a very large shoe size. When I would complain my mom said, “Nicole, it just means you have a good understanding.” A little silly, but she made her point. Find the positive.
http://www.louisvuittonoutlet.in.net/,
http://www.nikeairmax-pas-cher.fr/,
http://www.sac–louisvuitton.fr/,
http://www.toryburchoutlet-online.in.net/,
http://www.truereligionoutlet.in.net/,
http://www.cheapoakleysunglasses.in.net/,
http://www.nike-rosherun.fr/,
http://www.christianlouboutin-outlet.in.net/,
http://www.polo-ralphlauren.in.net/,
http://www.christianlouboutinshoes.in.net/,
http://www.nikeairmax.in.net/,
http://www.nikefreerun.in.net/,
http://www.longchampoutletonline.in.net/,
http://www.sac-longchamps.fr/,
http://www.nikeair-max.fr/,
http://www.chanel-handbags.in.net/,
http://www.coachoutlet.in.net/,
http://www.red-bottomshoes.in.net/,
http://www.louisvuitton.in.net/,
http://www.tiffanyandco-jewelry.in.net/,
http://www.sacburberry-pascher.fr/,
http://www.katespadehandbags.in.net/,
http://www.michaelkorshandbags.in.net/,
http://www.coachoutlet–storeonline.com/,
http://www.louisvuittonoutletstores.in.net/,
http://www.michaelkorsoutlet.in.net/,
http://www.nikefreerun.fr/,
http://www.tiffany-and-co.in.net/,
http://www.louboutin–pascher.fr/,
http://www.louisvuittonhandbags.in.net/,
http://www.nikeoutlet.in.net/,
http://www.outletonline-michaelkors.com/,
http://www.longchamphandbagsoutlet.us.com/,
http://www.sacmichaelkors-pascher.fr/,
http://www.polo-ralphlauren-pascher.fr/,
http://www.pradahandbags.in.net/,
http://www.rayban-sunglasses.in.net/,
http://www.michaelkorsoutlet-online.us.com/,
http://www.oakley-sunglasses.in.net/,
http://www.oakleysunglasses.in.net/,
http://www.guccihandbagsoutlet.in.net/,
http://www.michael-kors-outlet-online.us.com/,
http://www.truereligionjeansoutlet.in.net/,
http://www.katespadeoutletonline.in.net/,
http://www.louboutinshoes.in.net/,
http://www.michaelkorsoutletstore.in.net/,
http://www.burberryoutlet.in.net/,
http://www.coachpurses.in.net/,
http://www.pradaoutlet.in.net/,
http://www.saclongchamp-pas-cher.fr/,
http://www.coachfactoryoutletonline.in.net/,
http://www.poloralphlaurenoutlet.in.net/,
http://www.nikeairmaxinc.com/,
http://www.louisvuittonoutletonline.in.net/,
http://www.raybansunglasses.in.net/,
http://www.longchamphandbags.us.com/,
http://www.jordanshoes.in.net/,
http://www.burberryoutlet-online.in.net/,
http://www.louisvuitton-pascher.fr/,
http://www.airjordanpas-cher.fr/,
http://www.truereligion.in.net/
http://www.sac-burberry-pascher.fr/, http://www.airjordanpas-cher.fr/, http://www.canada-goose-jackets.ca/, http://www.nike-airmax.nl/, http://www.moncler-online-shop.de/, http://www.monclerjacketsoutlet.net/, http://www.michaelkorsoutlet-store.in.net/, http://www.vans-scarpe.it/, http://www.oakleysunglasses.jp.net/, http://www.air-jordanshoes.com/, http://www.nike-airmax-pas-cher.fr/, http://www.michaelkors-outlet-online.us.com/, http://www.uggs–canada.ca/, http://www.borse-gucci.it/, http://www.ugg-australia.it/, http://www.soccerjerseys.com.co/, http://www.oakleyglass.in.net/, http://www.coachpurse.in.net/, http://www.juicycoutureoutlet.com.co/, http://www.poloralphlauren-pascher.fr/, http://www.nikefree-running.co.uk/, http://www.louisvuittonoutlet-online.org/, http://www.asicso.com/, http://www.valentino-shoes.net/, http://www.christian-louboutin.me.uk/, http://www.occhiali–oakley.it/, http://www.doudoune-monclerpascher.fr/, http://www.reebok-outlet.in.net/, http://www.lululemon-outlet-canada.ca/, http://www.ugg-pas-cher.fr/, http://www.raybansunglass.in.net/, http://www.uggs-outletboots.in.net/, http://www.nikeair-max.fr/, http://www.coachoutlet.jp.net/, http://www.converse-pas-cher.fr/, http://www.p90x-workout.us.com/, http://coachofficialsite.blog.com/, http://www.ray–ban.it/, http://www.rayban–sunglasses.in.net/, http://www.true-religion-jeans.in.net/, http://www.nike-roshe-run.fr/, http://www.replica–watches.me.uk/, http://www.nike-freerun.com/, http://www.katespade-handbags.in.net/,