• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Margie ClaymanMargie Clayman

Marietta, OH

  • About Me
  • Marketing
  • Librarianship
  • Random Musings
  • Contact Me

Myth: Marketing consists of just talking to people (or what is Social Media Marketing)

April 16, 2012 by Margie Clayman 16 Comments

When I first started tweeting and blogging, the big thing everybody was talking about was, “You need to network and really engage with people.” That seemed to be the end-all and be-all of most social media advice you got. This advice was offered regardless of your business. If you were a marketer – you needed to engage. A lawyer? You’d better engage. A salesman for cans of dried soybeans? Yep. You’d better engage.

The problem I’ve had with this is that just talking to people makes marketing (or selling) kind of difficult. If I ask you how your ill family member is doing, you might like me better as a person, but will that make you buy from me? Not necessarily. In fact, in that kind of scenario, what I do for business is probably the last thing on your mind.

Now, the tide is turning and we are trying to talk about social media as just another marketing channel. However, I fear that there are some big steps missing in this transition. How can we go from just “talking” to actually using social media as a marketing platform?

What is marketing?

Initially, I was going to make this post primarily about the dichotomy between “talking to people” and marketing. I asked my Facebook crew how they defined marketing. I got a wide diversity of answers, only a few of which were the results of me knowing some very smartypants people (i.e. marketing is lying, marketing is a myth). I lead a hard life. Anyway, here are some of the answers I got:

“Building a structured awareness of a product or service to a targeted buyer.” ~Bob Reed

“Marketing is basically everything behind the process of creating lifelong customers.” ~Olivier Blanchard

“For me, marketing encompasses everything from POP, packaging, media to the person the company hires to deliver their widget to the masses, but I’m pervasive that way.” Molly Cantrell-Kraig

“Marketing is the art and science of communicating the value of your product or service to prospective and current customers.” ~Sean McGinnis

“Influencing (positively and/or negatively) consumer behavior through targeted messaging.” ~Andree Cojocariu

I also remembered that while back Heidi Cohen had gathered insight into how people defined marketing. Heidi notes that the American Marketing Association defines marketing thusly:

“Marketing is the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for customers, clients, partners, and society at large.”

I guess they should know.

So, I had my definitions of marketing. But then my friend Nic Wirtz threw me a little curveball. He said, “I’m stuck. Social media is mainly ‘talking/engaging with people’.” If that’s true, I began to wonder if social media “marketing” is really an appropriate phrase to use.

The catch with marketing on social media

Here’s the big problem. With so much emphasis early on focusing on “engagement” and “the conversation,” marketing got framed as bad, as did selling. If by sheer chance you talked to someone who needed a car and you sold cars, then you were the beneficiary of social media serendipity, but I’m not 100% sure that’s marketing, at least based on traditional definitions. If you talk to people a lot and they know who you work for but you never talk about business, you might be sharing value with potential customers, but it’s a value that does not always tie directly back to your business.

Knowing that most companies need to make money in order to survive, some companies have tried to barge into social media communities with a strong “buy me” message. Note what happened, for example, when Toyota decided to message countless people with promotional messages around Super Bowl time. These kinds of ploys make people feel like marketers and marketing are yucky (professional term). Note, for example, how Dan Perez reacted when marketers started jumping onto the Pinterest bandwagon. Certainly those kinds of tactics aren’t positive either.

So, if talking to people is NOT marketing and marketing on social media sites is evil, what do we mean when we say “social media marketing?” Is this some sort of hybrid created by Dr.Xavier in his secret hideout?

Social Media Marketing

This is a case where, honestly, I really don’t have a 100% solid answer. Wikipedia defines social media marketing as: “The process of gaining website traffic or attention through social media sites.” That could well be part of it, but the purpose of marketing is really to create sales, right? I mean, that’s what you’re hoping for. Maybe this is how people got so confused about ROI. If you are driving traffic to your website, it may look like your social media marketing campaign is a success. However, if all of those people are visiting and then leaving without buying (or maybe without even coming back) you’re in a bit of a pickle.

So, if we can agree that marketing is NOT talking to people, and if we can agree that marketing on a lot of social media sites is most definitely frowned upon, and if we can agree that social media marketing ultimately needs to drive sales, how are we defining social media marketing?

Or am I just crunching my brains over a peanut?

I’d love to hear your thoughts!

Image Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/intersectionconsulting/3542116767/ via Creative Commons

 

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. ToyotaEquipment says

    April 16, 2012 at 5:43 am

    Don’t forget why you got in the game. You can be and should be “social”, but it must be done in the context of promoting some value you or the company offer.

    Reply
    • RababKhan says

      April 16, 2012 at 7:19 am

       @ToyotaEquipment So you’re saying that all social media conversations should be “because” of the company you represent and not the person you are?

      Reply
      • margieclayman says

        April 16, 2012 at 7:03 pm

         @RababKhan  @ToyotaEquipment I think what Kyle is hitting on here is the confusion that the phrase “human brand” created. The idea that a person can be affiliated with a brand, or that a person can sort of become the face of a brand, morphed into a world where the person IS the brand. I think a lot of the current confusion stems from that early train of thought that got a bit twisted and misunderstood.

        Reply
  2. ardath421 says

    April 16, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    Hi Margie,
    Great topic for discussion. My thoughts took on a life of their own, so I posted them on my blog:
    http://marketinginteractions.typepad.com/marketing_interactions/2012/04/marketing-beyond-the-chit-chat-in-social-media.html

    Reply
    • margieclayman says

      April 16, 2012 at 7:03 pm

       @ardath421 Awesome! I’ll be sure to check it out. Thank you! 🙂

      Reply
  3. MomInManagement says

    April 16, 2012 at 12:56 pm

    Fabulous post Margie and one I’ve been struggling with too.  I have been wondering about the value to brands for me to review and post about their products.  I have my social media friends – when they post product stuff I tend to ignore it (maybe am influenced 10%) but mostly I’m waiting to hear their personal stuff or their thought provoking stuff (like this) or their funny stuff.  
     
    Hmmm. 

    Reply
    • margieclayman says

      April 16, 2012 at 7:04 pm

       @MomInManagement Then there’s the fact that I really don’t know what most of my online friends do for a living, not to mention where they work. So the argument that networking can pave the way to a sale kind of loses juice for me. 

      Reply
  4. NicWirtz says

    April 16, 2012 at 1:21 pm

    You’re right on how social media has and is changing. The problem and beauty of social media is we’re all individuals, some over share, some under share. So saying SM is just another marketing channel is incorrect, what would be great and indeed something you’ve done many times is a post, hell a series on how to engage.I don’t really want to know about family illness. If I’m a business I want to go down the route of proving my expertise. This enhances my standing and leads to opportunities for work or link ups. Hopefully. At the same time I don’t want a business’s feed to be entirely business. A feed that is entirely business will turn into a marketing channel.This leads to a very difficult balancing act, which goes back to engagement issues.The car example you give seems to be more of a sales situation than marketing. However, if you believe that social media is in effect marketing ourselves and/or our business, you could argue it’s marketing too.Journalists have agonised over social media. Some because of the technical issues, many more because of the ethics of it. Having always been observers, people that write up events from an allegedly non-partizan point of view, we’ve seen media change to embracing polemic views. Add in the ability to self-publish, something that has still only been with us for little more than a decade and journalism has fundamentally changed in that time. Add in 60,000 journalists losing their jobs since 2005 and that’s only in the US and you see an industry in crisis.
     
    The funny thing is that we’ve always marketed ourselves, otherwise we’d be sat at home watching daytime TV as a career. It’s just a little easier and a little more obvious now.I stand by my “lying” but that’s because I have an insatiable demand for ‘the truth”. I’m less the Fonz, more Tom Cruise in A Few Good Men. Marketeers and PR professionals are the Jack Nicholsons to my Cruise. It’s that desire to post a veneer over reality that grates. The funny thing is we’re all in the storytelling business, we just have different interpretations of that story.
     
    Dan’s rants generally hit the nail on the head. The problem of a new platform, as I see it, is that people want somewhere to hang out and not be sold something. Marketing requires finding places where people that hang out and err sell them something.
     
    “I want to be left alone,” versus “Buy this!” Is not going to be a match made in heaven.
     
    Marketing is not all evil. Social media is not all marketing. Because social media was taken over by many marketing departments, the two have become inextricably linked. Besides the fact I don’t want marketing in charge of social media, 
     
    There’s a backlash against social media marketing because people don’t want their space invaded. So either social media marketing is more subtle than most efforts, it’s “passive” marketing by creating relationships without selling anything to them. Or it’s in your face, “Buy This NOW!” 
     
    Or you leave social media and marketing as entirely separate categories and say that SMM is the art of relationship building that may lead to positive benefits for your company.
     
    Rather than trying to convert connections to sales,  we’re talking on a global scale now so take every connection as having the potential to improve your business. It’s slightly more random.

    Reply
    • margieclayman says

      April 16, 2012 at 7:08 pm

       @NicWirtz And here is the comment for today that is better than my post. Darn it people!
       
      There definitely are a lot of grey areas. People who border on what I consider extremely unprofessional always make me wonder. You really want to post about how drunk you’ve been for the last 3 weeks, huh? OK. Then you want me to watch your webinar and respect your professional expertise. Hmmmmmm. Tough one.
       
      There’s a lot of talk about whether you can share personal stuff online without hurting your professional self. I think you can, but I think you need to have some limits. As a marketer, you need to have limits. Spamming thousands of people will never be a good idea. Talking about nothing but kitties is also not a good idea. Just jumping in without a plan will never be a good idea.
       
      So, then, what are we left with? A lot of confusion, apparently 🙂

      Reply
  5. Wittlake says

    April 16, 2012 at 1:22 pm

    Definitely a dichotomy in social media, but I’m not convinced it is actually as big of a disconnect. The biggest problem I see is that “conversation” isn’t connected. Conversation or engagement is generally good advice as part of an overall plan, but it has been adopted standalone, without connecting that engagement to the process of educating prospective buyers and uncovering new sales opportunities.

    Reply
    • margieclayman says

      April 16, 2012 at 7:09 pm

       @Wittlake I think that’s a great point. People were told to converse but they didn’t ask the pivotal question. “Then what?”
       
      That’s what’s missing, in my humble opinion. The then what factor.

      Reply
  6. AmyMccTobin says

    April 17, 2012 at 1:35 pm

    The other day I was wasting more time on Facebook and a little ad showed up on the right column with these beautiful colored glass outdoor lanterns. I clicked on it and discovered https://www.jossandmain.com/ . I hate shopping in Real Life, but I LOVED this company’s products.  I would not have discovered them without their pretty little picture seducing me.  THAT is Social Media Marketing in my book.
     
    Great post Margie!

    Reply
  7. janwong says

    April 18, 2012 at 12:18 am

    Hmm I think it is possible to split ‘social media marketing’ into two parts: marketing / sales and communication / talking. While it sounds the same, it can really be a little different.The marketing bit is where brands go on campaigns and promotions to make themselves known using whatever medium there is available. This is the same as putting up a TVC, flyer distribution campaign or advertising on the billboard where the brand tries to standout from the rest by being different, even online.Now the communication bit is where social media networks really shine. It now acts as a follow-up from the marketing campaign to address any issues, concerns, feedbacks and etc, an avenue to show that the brand takes time to service its customers, and to show that the brand is alive and well by the daily updates.I believe the confusion starts when brands try to over-strategize the content of their communications for example, “to say hello and ask what are the fans doing today” and attempts to insert a sales element to it. If the brand genuinely wants to say “hello”, there shouldn’t be a “what’s next?” after that.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Social Media Marketing Tips For Business says:
    April 16, 2012 at 2:16 pm

    […] You are here: Home / Alphabet of Marketing Myths / Myth: Marketing consists of just talking to people (or what is Social Media Marketing) …www.margieclayman.com/myth-marketing-consists-of-just-tal… […]

    Reply
  2. Myth: Marketing Consists of Just Talking to People (Or What is Social Media … | ResidualRx.com says:
    April 21, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    […] article originally appeared on Social Media, Marketing, Musings and has been republished with […]

    Reply
  3. Myth: Marketing Consists of Just Talking to People (Or What is Social Media … | Second Income Education says:
    April 21, 2012 at 9:24 pm

    […] article originally appeared on Social Media, Marketing, Musings and has been republished with […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post: « Pondering Hubris
Next Post: the fat picture »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Seeing Double: African American Literature
  • Book Review: Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow
  • Book Review: Land of Lincoln, by Andrew Ferguson
  • The portrayal of the infertile woman in entertainment
  • Chapter 3: A Weird Thing Happened Today

Recent Comments

  • Delores Baskerville on Are you locking out blog subscribers?
  • frank c tripoli on Book Review: Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow
  • Lyv on #30Thursday number 10 (we’re in the double digits?!?)
  • Fitoru on New Recipes, 2013
  • Anna Wyatt on Help me petition to deactivate driver-side airbags for Little People

Archives

  • February 2021
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2007
  • April 2007

Categories

  • Book Reviews
  • Crafts and Charity
  • Gardening for Renters
  • Marketing Talk
  • Molly Maggie McGuire
  • Musings
  • PassionPlayers
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Footer

marjorie.clayman@gmail.com

   

Margie Clayman © 2021