• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Margie ClaymanMargie Clayman

Marietta, OH

  • About Me
  • Marketing
  • Librarianship
  • Random Musings
  • Contact Me

that uncomfortable feeling

March 30, 2011 by Margie Clayman 8 Comments

No, this is not a blog post for Preparation H. Do not fear.

About a week ago, my friend Chase Adams (@RealChaseAdamas) posed a very interesting question. He said, “How do you handle situations like when someone sends you a DM but you can’t respond because they aren’t following you?”

It’s a great question for two reasons. First, I’m sure a lot of other people have a similar question. Second, it brings to mind all kinds of other uncomfortable situations that can unfold in the crazy world of Social Media.

So sit down on a thumbtack, get a papercut, and let’s talk about how to handle some uncomfortable Social Media scenarios!

Oh Romeo, Romeo, whyfore did you send me a DM when you don’t follow me?

Said Shakespeare.

This has happened to me a couple of times in my year-long venture into Twitter world. If you don’t know, a direct message is essentially like an email message, but you can send it within the framework of Twitter. The trick is that you can only send a message to people who are following you. This means that you can send a direct message to someone and then they are not able to respond if you aren’t actually following them.

So what do you do? Here are some ideas. I’d love to hear yours!

• Respond in a vague way in the open stream. This can be difficult if the direct message was asking you something personal, but then, if someone is asking you something personal, they should probably be following you.

• Gently let the person know they’re not following you, and thus you can’t respond. This does not mean that you tweet out something like, “Hey dirt bag, you’re not following me, and therefore, I not only can’t answer your DM, but I’m also going to put a curse on your house, and on your little dog, too!” No, that is not good etiquette at all. Rather, you say something simple like, “Hey so and so, I got your DM but I can’t answer you back. Can you follow me so I can answer?”

• Go to the person’s blog site or web site and see if you can find an email address. This is far out of the public eye, which the person may appreciate. You can even continue your conversation in the comfortable confines of email if you wish. Yay for more than 140 characters!

• Leave a comment on the person’s blog site and work in a quick mention of the DM. Again, don’t do this in a mean way. Just say, “BTW, I got your DM but I think you need to follow me before I can respond.” Easy peasy!

Oh, darn. I seem to be like, totally attacked, Horatio!

Said Shakespeare.

A lot of times, when you are working online, it’s easy to assume that someone has been plotting to attack you for, well, maybe years upon years. The major obstacle with online communication is that you can’t really see or hear what the person’s intent is. You don’t get the cue of a facial expression. Those avatars are always smiling at you. Because of this inability to 100% know what someone’s intent is, it is highly advisable to avoid flying off the handle. Sometimes I’ll send something to a friend who I know will be honest with me. “What do you think of this?” I’ll ask, without leading the witness. It’s good to get an outside opinion.

Sometimes, though, it’s pretty hard to avoid the feeling that someone has it out for you. For example, if someone tweets to you, “I have it out for you,” there aren’t too many ways that can be interpreted. So what do you do?

Often times, the best idea is just to let the person vent and scream. Sometimes a friend will intercede on your behalf, but even that can get ugly. The whole flash mob thing gets unattractive when it becomes an insult trading mob. Be like the Fonz. Be cool. Or be like a duck. Let it roll off your back. Remember, unlike in real life, you can just simply walk away from your computer screen to cool down. It won’t follow you, unless you’ve got really weird things going on.

My mind is on my money and my money’s on my mind.

Said Snoop Dogg.

Sometimes people end up spamming you to death. It can be about their super cool new blog post. It can be about a product they’re introducing. It can be about their new child. Well, that one is kind of fun. But anyway, sometimes people get very fixated on what it is they’re trying to accomplish, and they forget that you’re a human being.

In these situations, I generally try 1 of 2 approaches.

Approach 1: Hit ignore button. Rinse. Repeat.

Approach 2: Gently nudge the person, preferably out of the public stream if you can. Again, you want to be very careful with your tonality because people are automatically going to be on the defensive when you critique them. I try to phrase it like, “Hey, I wanted to give you a heads up that you seem to be tweeting a lot about this blog post and it might rub some folks the wrong way. Maybe try to mix it up a bit.”

In the worst case scenario, the person might be really infuriated that you are coaching them, and they might exit from your community. If they were pretty much spamming you non-stop, you may be kind of okay with that. In the best case scenario, the person will thank you for the tip, and you’ll solidify your relationship.

Now it’s your turn!

What prickly situations have you encountered online? How did you deal with them? Let’s talk about it!

This is post #19 in the Engagement Series. Thank you so much for sticking with me!

Image by Thad Zajdowicz. http://www.sxc.hu/profile/thadz

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Suzanne Vara says

    March 30, 2011 at 3:16 am

    It is very uncomfortable and how we handle it tells a whole lot about who we are. I have encountered this and have simply in the open stream asked them to follow back so I can answer them. Now there is the few times that twitter has unfollowed me for them and they are unaware of it however it is still uncomfortable. I have also had the unfortunate experience of a DM that went to a public stream. I think that was more uncomfortable than them not following actually.

    DM’s are great until they get overtaken by the spammers and we are missing the messages that we want. We want to scream at the spammers but then again we know they do not care. It places us in a difficult position as if we call them out, we are wasting our time but yet they are clogging up our dm’s. I guess in retrospect, it is only characters and while we have to take the time to delete, it is better than the email spam that plagues us.

    It is interesting to think about it though if someone dm’s us that would like response, wouldn’t they think to check to be sure that they are following us? Maybe they do and know we cannot send back. Hmh, interesting to really think about.

    Thanks for writing about this as it is something that we all encounter and find ourselves wondering what we should do.

    Z-Mag

    Reply
    • Margie Clayman says

      March 30, 2011 at 2:58 pm

      Thank you for your insight, as per usual, Z-Mag 🙂

      It is something that tends to make me wonder, but then I think I may have accidentally done this to someone else a few times. We’re all just moving too darned fast! 🙂

      Reply
  2. Mark says

    March 30, 2011 at 4:45 am

    The how “unfollow” as a translative verb spooks me. Feelings are hurt, when really people are just trying to find a tribe, or channel their stream. I think, sadly it’ll be Oxford’s new word for 2011 (better than refudiate, anyhow).

    PS. marvelous use of quotes…there is a posting “aesthetic” emerging, and I see one strong voice here 🙂

    Cheers,
    M

    Reply
    • Margie Clayman says

      March 30, 2011 at 2:59 pm

      Thanks so much, Mark 🙂

      Reply
  3. Anonymous says

    March 30, 2011 at 10:06 am

    Hi, I think this is a great post, but I couldn’t find your email address on here (I don’t have time to do much searching.) Just a note: I think what Shakespeare said was “wherefore”, not “whyfore.” I understand if you choose to delete this comment. It’s not intended to be snarky, just to help out a person who is making a great point, although it can be a good idea to follow one’s own advice (and I’ll be reviewing my own site, determining whether I want to do this myself). 🙂

    Reply
    • Margie Clayman says

      March 30, 2011 at 3:00 pm

      Not snarky at all 🙂 I was playing with the quotes (as you can tell). I made up the word “whyfore” quite awhile ago and I just…like it 🙂 It is wherefore in the proper Shakespearean sense, however. You are quite right! 🙂

      Reply
  4. Patrick Prothe says

    April 1, 2011 at 12:18 am

    This has happened to me a couple times recently. I try to respond via my iPhone and think something’s wrong with my connection. I hit send again and think, what do you mean I can send this message. How hard is it. It’s under 140. Just send it little iPhone!!! Then I read a little closer and see that I can’t because they’re not following me. Yes, that’s awkward. So depending on the who and what I respond with an ‘@’ and move along. Because, hey, it’s not my fault I can’t respond because you’re not following me. And I think if it’s that important they might figure it out . . . eventually.

    Reply
    • Margie Clayman says

      April 1, 2011 at 6:29 am

      That happens to me as well, but then the super awesome thing is that sometimes my blackberry says the person is not following me, but then when I go to the web version they are.

      How do you like THEM apples? 😀

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post: « Where are Little People in the Business World?
Next Post: New Time for TweetDiner »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Seeing Double: African American Literature
  • Book Review: Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow
  • Book Review: Land of Lincoln, by Andrew Ferguson
  • The portrayal of the infertile woman in entertainment
  • Chapter 3: A Weird Thing Happened Today

Recent Comments

  • Delores Baskerville on Are you locking out blog subscribers?
  • frank c tripoli on Book Review: Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow
  • Lyv on #30Thursday number 10 (we’re in the double digits?!?)
  • Fitoru on New Recipes, 2013
  • Anna Wyatt on Help me petition to deactivate driver-side airbags for Little People

Archives

  • February 2021
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2007
  • April 2007

Categories

  • Book Reviews
  • Crafts and Charity
  • Gardening for Renters
  • Marketing Talk
  • Molly Maggie McGuire
  • Musings
  • PassionPlayers
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Footer

marjorie.clayman@gmail.com

   

Margie Clayman © 2021