• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Margie ClaymanMargie Clayman

Marietta, OH

  • About Me
  • Marketing
  • Librarianship
  • Random Musings
  • Contact Me

The Project Runway Factor: Three Tough Engagement Lessons

April 4, 2011 by Margie Clayman 12 Comments

So on Saturday, while I checked back periodically on the #care4Japan stream, I engaged in spring cleaning activities. As you might imagine, after I was done, I was more than happy to sit in a stupor in front of the television for awhile! My Cleveland Indians are little more than putrid stinkyheads, so I decided to do some channel surfing. I came upon an episode of Project Runway, and since I know SO many people who rave about that darned show, I thought I would give it a try.

It actually taught me something interesting, believe it or not, proving that you can really get inspiration from anything ๐Ÿ™‚

The episode was “Design a costume for a drag queen,” and RuPaul was the guest judge. One of the designers created a gown that was actually kind of pretty, in my opinion, but for the judges and for that given challenge, it didn’t do the trick. It wasn’t ostentatious enough. It looked too normal. “It looks like a regular dress,” they said. The designer got kicked off, but he was clearly perplexed. For him, the gown had been a pretty loud departure from his norm.

There are three important lessons you can learn about online engagement from this silly television incident.

1. Nobody cares how it reads to you

Like I said, the designer really felt like he had gone pretty far out of his comfort zone. The dress he made was a pretty loud orange and yellow “tango” dress. Instead of saying, “Oh, ok, you actually win, then,” the judges actually further judged the contestant down because he refused to listen to them.

What does this mean to you? Even if you have the best intentions…even if you think you are going way out on a limb…even if you think your point is as crystal clear as a mountain stream…if someone else reads your content in a different way, that is how they will interpret it. This can be intimidating in the blog world because you want people to kind of get what you’re saying. It can really be intimidating on Twitter, where you need to express complex thoughts in 140 characters. It might be hard, but that’s just the way it is. Your content is being read by people outside your brain (hopefully). How THEY read your work is what matters in the online world.

Read your work out loud as if you had never seen it before. Have a family member or a friend read a post now and then. Do they see where you’re coming from, both linguistically and in terms of tone? Make sure you step outside yourself and imagine how your work will impact (or not impact) others).

2. Consider where you are

One mistake that the designer made, according to the judges, is that he didn’t fully consider the context for what he was doing. His gown looked kind of classy and like formal wear. “This is for a drag queen show, man!” The judges said. “Where are the sequins and the jewels?” Because this particular designer didn’t really understand the culture that he was getting involved in, these criticisms didn’t make sense to him, and you could tell that was the case.

In the online world, the trick is that you can think you have a 100% great handle on your environment, yet you can be 100% wrong. I made a jokey comment to someone who was actually being kind of sarcastic and abrasive, so I figured they’d find my comment funny. I found out later they badmouthed me for the next two days because they thought I had been serious. I had misinterpreted my environment and had miscalculated by a long shot, apparently. You have to be endlessly careful in making sure you are measuring the context in which your tweet, blog, or update will appear. And then…recalculate again.

Always remember, always, that anything you say online can be shared, even if your account is locked down. Always remember that people don’t hear your voice intonations when they read. They hear theirs. And remember that they don’t know that you are referring to that dirtbag from your 7th birthday, not, say…them.

3. Arguing makes it worse

It seems counter-intuitive, but defending your work can sometimes make the situation more explosive. Maybe that designer would have gotten a second chance if he hadn’t gone the route of getting a bit snippy with the judges and saying, “Well, this is way out there for me.” Maybe not, but it certainly didn’t help his cause.

There is a chronic disease among those in the online world. It’s called, “Iwanttoberight-itis.” It’s chronic because it never goes away. We always want to be read the way we intend. We always want to be viewed as the expert, as the resource.ย  And when someone comes in and says, “You’re wrong,” or “I read this a different way,” or something like that, well, it can be enough to break our little hearts, right?

It’s time to cure yourself of that illness.

If someone reads something you did not intend, whether good or bad, that is your new reality. And it’s your reality only in terms of engaging with that one person. Even though there are millions of people in the online world, you deal with them one single person at a time most of the time. If you argue every time someone questions something you say, people will either avoid you or fight with you, and that can only make you look bad.

When you receive criticism that is well-stated online, push your slashed ego off to the side and see if you can see what the person is telling you. See if there is merit there. Most of the time, you can learn an awful lot by pausing to listen.

Do these three lessons make sense to you? Have you had to deal with any of these scenarios before? I’d love to hear about it!

this is post #24 in The Engagement Series. Do you have post ideas for me? Let me have ’em!

Filed Under: Marketing Talk

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. GrandMaOnDeck says

    April 4, 2011 at 7:04 am

    Wow! Well stated. What is my take on this? If you have 5 readers you could very well have five different takes on what you just said. Draw any good from it and move on.,

    Reply
    • Peggy says

      April 4, 2011 at 8:12 am

      If we all thought and talked and said the same thing, life would really be dull.

      Reply
      • Margie Clayman says

        April 4, 2011 at 11:10 am

        Very true. And we’d probably still find something to fight about ๐Ÿ™‚

        Reply
    • Margie Clayman says

      April 4, 2011 at 11:09 am

      Well said, Gloria. At some point you need to take ownership of what you write while also realizing that people may not absorb it the way you wanted. Learn from each experience and then, as you say, move on ๐Ÿ™‚

      Reply
  2. Nancy Davis says

    April 4, 2011 at 7:16 am

    Those lessons apply not only in blogging and Twitter, but also other communications such as text messaging. How many times I have thought someone was upset with me because I read a message and felt it was a bit harsh? This is why we really do have to be very careful about what we put out there and make sure we are clear in our communications. I dislike text messaging for the reason that it can be hard to tell someone’s tone.

    I love the fact that we can pick up inspiration just about anywhere. It seems that contestant failed to know his audience, and he paid for that.

    Reply
    • Margie Clayman says

      April 4, 2011 at 11:11 am

      100% well said, Nancy. It’s so easy to come across in an email or in a text message as if you’re angry or sour. Just look at how some people get offended by the use of all caps! If we’re having a good day, we may read compliments that aren’t really there. If we’re having a bad day, we bring that baggage. You can’t avoid ruffling feathers all of the time, but if you do, you need to take that in stride and try to fix the situation as best you can.

      Reply
  3. Raul Colon says

    April 4, 2011 at 8:09 am

    Margie,

    I loved how you diagnosed the problem “Iwanttoberight-itis” I am going to have to find a translation in spanish. I agree with you every time someone approaches you with criticism you have to see if there is merit there. In my case I also try to gauge intention which online can be more difficult than if you where in person.

    If the person has a good history of teaching me and others great lessons that creates a level of trust.

    In my case I have someone that comes after me every once in a while because at one point I was getting tired of all the hatred she was sharing online. I tried to explain too much she got defensive. She saw my criticism as an attack and maybe looking back I could have stated my point of view in a different way. In reality this person till this day bad mouths me just because since she was so confrontational I decided to stop engaging with her.

    There are some people you just can share criticism with. I work everyday on identifying those people so I can work along those that are willing to listen and at least analyze my criticism. I focus on those who value what I have to say!

    Reply
    • Margie Clayman says

      April 4, 2011 at 11:12 am

      Sorry to hear about that, Raul. That’s a tough one. Often times, people do not like looking in the mirror to see that they are behaving poorly. If you are the one who shows them that reflection, all of their shame gets poured out on you as anger or frustration. Human nature, unfortunately.

      As for translating that chronic illness into Spanish? Hey, let me know how that goes! ๐Ÿ™‚

      Reply
  4. Susan Larson says

    April 4, 2011 at 8:55 am

    Excellent! Thank you.

    Reply
    • Margie Clayman says

      April 4, 2011 at 11:12 am

      Thanks Susan ๐Ÿ™‚ Glad you liked it!

      Reply
  5. Paula Lee Bright says

    April 4, 2011 at 2:15 pm

    Since I am almost always joking, and I don’t really want to change itโ€”it’s who I am, actuallyโ€”I sicken myself with the number of smilies and winking smilies and grins I use. I’m tired of those things, and I imagine my friends are too.

    But if I write like myself, even carefully, I’m still probably half tongue-in-cheek. And I can’t figure any other way to impart that. If you have any ideas, Margie, I’d love to hear them, because I know you think great thoughts. Whereas I tend to think less serious things. Unless of course I’m on a post that I feel passionately about. No winkies there, for sure.

    Reply
    • Margie Clayman says

      April 4, 2011 at 4:35 pm

      It’s hard, but I have to tell you, it’s worth it to be super cautious. As I said, I’ve joked around with people who I thought knew me pretty well and still ended up hurting their feelings because they misunderstood my sarcasm. It’s just not a risk you can take. If you know that you can be easily misread and that bothers you, try having someone else read what you have written and see what their response is. Do they read it with the same tonality you intended? If not, you may want to revisit your content.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post: « The Tao of Twitter: A Review
Next Post: How to get 25% of your visitors to take an action on your blog »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Seeing Double: African American Literature
  • Book Review: Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow
  • Book Review: Land of Lincoln, by Andrew Ferguson
  • The portrayal of the infertile woman in entertainment
  • Chapter 3: A Weird Thing Happened Today

Recent Comments

  • Delores Baskerville on Are you locking out blog subscribers?
  • frank c tripoli on Book Review: Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow
  • Lyv on #30Thursday number 10 (we’re in the double digits?!?)
  • Fitoru on New Recipes, 2013
  • Anna Wyatt on Help me petition to deactivate driver-side airbags for Little People

Archives

  • February 2021
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2007
  • April 2007

Categories

  • Book Reviews
  • Crafts and Charity
  • Gardening for Renters
  • Marketing Talk
  • Molly Maggie McGuire
  • Musings
  • PassionPlayers
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Footer

marjorie.clayman@gmail.com

   

Margie Clayman © 2022